Universal Access To All Knowledge
Home Donate | Store | Blog | FAQ | Jobs | Volunteer Positions | Contact | Bios | Forums | Projects | Terms, Privacy, & Copyright
Search: Advanced Search
Anonymous User (login or join us)
Upload

Reply to this post | Go Back
View Post [edit]

Poster: Scoobydew Date: May 28, 2005 5:25am
Forum: etree Subject: rad2003-04-30.flac

i got an email saying my upload failed verification. I checked my md5 & it matches exactly with all the tracks. I know there are no errors on this recording. Mike Parillo said Brad LeBlanc should be able to sort this out for me. Please let know what to do. I used binary mode also. thanks

Attachment: rad2003-04-30.flac.md5
Attachment: rad2003-04-30.txt.txt

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: xtifr Date: May 28, 2005 7:49am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: rad2003-04-30.flac

Something similar happened to me with a flac fileset once. Really puzzled me for a while. Turned out that one of the files had gotten corrupted between the time I'd compressed it and the time I made the md5s, so the md5 matched the bad file. And the fingerprint is just stored in the flac, so seemed to be ok too. It wasn't until I ran the flac integrity check ("flac -t" at the command line) that I discovered the bad file. I just deleted it, re-compressed the original, made a new md5 file and a new fingerprint file, and everything was fine.

It would be nice if the Archive gave you more details about non-md5-related errors - it would have saved me a lot of floundering - but oh well.

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Administrator, Curator, or StaffBrad Leblanc Date: May 28, 2005 8:06am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: rad2003-04-30.flac

I betcha this is the track that failed. Am I right? (check the email, it will tell you)

6788a396019cad9eeb2119f1d67821b5 *rad2003-04-30.txt.txt

Reply to this post
Reply [edit]

Poster: Scoobydew Date: May 29, 2005 5:56am
Forum: etree Subject: Re: rad2003-04-30.flac

nope it was all of them even though there are no errors. i am re-uploading it now.